Mandantory paternity testing at birth


An mra friend of mine asked on his fb whether people thought paternity testing at birth should be mandatory. Since it is estimated that historically 5 – 10% of children were not biologically related to the fathers who were raising them and since this number must have risen dramatically in the current polyamorous hook-up culture this is a valid proposal.  I had a discussion on this topic a few months back on my old fb profile. Since that is gone and I no longer trust fb to not take this profile away as well and since my answer is too long for a fb post I will lay it out in this blog post.

My answer: Definitely!

Benefits

1) It would bring more harmony to families. There would be less tension over unresolved conflicts. Thus, less likelihood for domestic violence to occur. Less likelihood for children and adults to develop personality disorders or other serious behavioural problems. Children would grow up in stable families and become a blessing instead of a curse to those around them. They would help build strong communities and contribute to the betternment of mankind.

2) Resulting from the first and main reason it should be obvious that more harmony in families leads directly to greatly reduced government spending on police, social workers, hospitals and doctors, etc. Reduced crime benefits everyone, locals and visitors alike. Hospitals and doctors treating domestic violence cases and children/youths who have gotten involved in violence could be freed up to deal with e.g. cancer treatment.

3) Ending the current hook-up culture. If someone wants to be intimate with a different person every weekend or weekday they are free to do so. However, the research clearly shows the damaging psychological effects of establishing and immediatly breaking close bonds. Even people who haven’t experienced childhood or other trauma are getting increasingly psychologically insecure these days. And, no, I don’t want to reverse history.  There is no need to go back to Victorian times and have a chaperone accompany a young lady on her every outing. It should be possible to expect women to take responsibility for their own actions in the year 2016 😉 Just as we are expecting more of school children and professionals in their fields these days than we did 100 years ago we can expect young women to think of the consequences of their actions. Unfortunately, at the moment the consequences are a life that will be bitter when lived out – raising children on their own or in a dysfunctional relationship – but ahead of time do not look bad enough to keep women from sleeping with every Tom, Dick and Harry.

And while feminists would claim that there is still stigma attached to promiscuous women, they have already found a way of getting around that in allowing any woman who regrets what she did last night to easily get out of societal stigma and her own personal regrets by accusing the man of rape, thus making a mockery of actual victims of sexual assault and making men increasingly wary of getting involved with women in any way.

Thus, eliminating hook-up culture by implementing mandatory paternity testing at birth would at the same time bring down false rape accusations, which are running rampant at the moment, especially, at American and Candadian college campuses. As Camille Paglia said: “In the 70s we fought for freedom from ‘in loco parentis’ to be allowed to go wherever we wanted, whenever we wanted, so that we could make our own mistakes and learn from them, just like the boys. And today women want to be protected again.” Today’s young women are asking men to protect them. It seems they want an actual patriarchy. As a woman living in this society I sometimes wonder – when I look at my ‘sisters’ whether feminists aren’t right after all. Men have started to vote with their feet. It is men’s disapproval of women’s current behaviour, men’s shunning of women because their mere company has become a liability to a man’s life that is slowly leading to a sea change in matters concerning the lives of men and women. I personally don’t mind being mainly surrounded by men at men’s issues conferences – makes me feel like a fish in the water actually, since I grew up a tomboy – but I am deeply disappointed by how little responsibility my fellow women are taking for the course our society is taking.

4) Re-establishing trust or better than that: creating a new and better kind of trust between men and women. It is obvious to anyone that the situation at birth – when the woman definitely knows that she is the mother of the child but the ‘father’ has to blindly trust her is a deeply unequal one. In very rare cases the mother goes home with a child that isn’t hers and these cases of babies being mixed up in the hospital are always seen as deeply tragic. Ironically, when the father is affected in this way, no one seems to care. All this incessant talk about inequality but people seem to be blind to it when it’s men who are affected by it.

I see men talk about the costs of raising a child. Ironically, it tends to be those men who would happily spend 250,000 on raising a child that they have fathered, that they are getting to spend time with, that they are seeing grow from a girl into a woman or a boy into a man: a child that won’t suddenly be ripped from them, turned against them and only come back to ask for more money. Unsurprisingly this situation sends many men to an untimely death. Isn’t it ironic how feminists always claim they want men to be more emotional and when they are they call it misogyny and lobby to make laws against it.

A child is an investment in the future and so was a spouse once. You pooled your resources together because together they were worth more than individually. Now they are worth less after a few years when you have to separate them again. For many women they are worth more due to unjust laws but does that mean that women have all the power now and that their lives are filled with endless joy? You don’t need to read the much hyped book by the palliative care nurse Bonnie Ware ‘The Top Five Regrets of the Dying: A Life Transformed by the Dearly Departing’ to know that material posessions don’t bring happiness. Men’s high suicide rate is a clear indicator of men’s suffering from the current situation. But so is the insecurity and neediness of the vast majority of women I interact with on a daily basis. When I look into their faces I see the living dead.

Most of all a relationship with a child or an adult – romantic or friendship or familial – is an emotional investment that can only fail so often before a person becomes so wary of the accompanying pain of that failure that making that investment feels no longer worth it. That is the point at which we are at the moment. I can observe that very clearly in the experiences of a friend of mine with online dating. It’s not only not wanting to go for a meal – because who wants to spend 20 Euros, assuming the bill is split – on a person they might never see again – but the sheer unwillingness to actually get to know the other person. A chat over a drink is not getting to know someone. People get to know each other when there is sudden disharmony after the initial ‘the other person can’t do no wrong phase’ and they need to figure out what that is caused by: their attitudes/behaviour or the other person’s? something between them? something outside of them? Most people don’t get to that stage these days, whether online or offline. Big cities are increasingly referred to as single capitals and people on the look-out know that there is an overflow of supply of men and women looking for Mr or Mrs Right out there. They read books telling them there is no such person, that this whole concept is made up by Hollywood to sell cinema tickets. But they don’t learn anything from these books. I am an avid reader and I get lots of inspiration from great books. But neither I, nor anyone else is changed by reading a book in isolation. Books can never change people. Only people can change people. People that get so close under our skin that we want to do the hard work to become a better version of ourselves, making us as a result a better person to be in a relationship with (romantic, friendship or familial).

The benefits outlined above should reason enough to argue for mandatory paternity testing at birth. However, I will list the problems with the procedure that should be taken into account as well.

Problems

1) In a discussion I saw someone mention costs on the already overstretched health system. That is not an actual argument as they would be far outweighed by the spending savings outlined in benefits 2) Also, they would obviously come down a lot if this was carried out in high numbers.

2) And this is the only real problem I see: Most people think that because we refer to the natural sciences as hard sciences that the results are always accurate. That is a widespread myth. Faulty results in medical tests are much higher than most people know. Sadly, practioners and makers of the equipment prefer this information to not become widely known. One major reason, according to the author of the book ‘Risk Savvy – How to make good Decisions’, Gerd Gigerenzer, is the suing culture in North America. Another is the high income that can be generated from operating (cancer) patients, regardless of whether the operation is actually necessary.

A common pre-birth test at the moment is screening for Down Syndrome in the baby. For good or worse the number of children born with the genetic defect has gone sharply down since testing has become widespread. However, again and again women who had been told their baby was going to be born with Down Syndrome but decided against an abortion, gave birth to healthy babies.

Thus, babies with a positive test should be tested again and a counsellor should be present at all stages of the process in order to not damage perfectly healthy relationships. However, I expect the accuracy of the technology to increase sharply over time with its widespread use.

This article is not locked at this moment in time. Since I started writing I realised how many aspects there are to this issue. I have touched on quite a few but I will certainly keep coming back to this topic.

 

 

 

7 thoughts on “Mandantory paternity testing at birth

  1. Well Karen,

    I usually like what you are writing about men’s issues but this one here personally strikes me as incoherent.

    To make it short, your conclusions don’t sound very plausible to me and seem pretty constructed because structurally you base your whole argument on the vague notion that mandatory paternity testing would have a notable impact on “harmony in families”. You don’t even go into detail about why this should be the case not mentioning providing actual evidence for that (the way you portray it in your article as some sort of “general cure” for many of our problems it is an extraordinary claim which definitely requires good and thoughtful delivered explanations and extraordinary evidence).
    I think to someone who doesn’t already believe what you are telling him anyways this is going to sound very dubious and pretentious.

    While I think maybe I would support mandatory paternity testing in a system where the man can be hold legally accountable for “his” children I don’t think that it is very likely that the lack of this certainity really playes an important role in most of peoples relationship problems or dysharmonia in families etc.
    While it may be right in a moralistic perspective I actually think that the mandatory paternity test might actually INCREASE some of the problems you said it would reduce, for example if it happens to destroy “healthy” relationships and families of cheaters which would previously have just carried on.
    On the basis of the information provided in your blog article I don’t think I don’t understand where the certainity behind your arguments is coming from. Not at all.

    Sorry for the harsh words – don’t let it get you down,
    Maximilian Theodor Kircher

    • No worries, Theo, you know that criticism spurns me on. 🙂 How else would I be able to improve my arguments?

      “you base your whole argument on the vague notion that mandatory paternity testing would have a notable impact on “harmony in families”. You don’t even go into detail about why this should be the case not mentioning providing actual evidence for that”

      That is absolutely true and I was aware of that weak spot of my blog article. But you, it’s a blog article and it was already 3 pages of an MS Word document long. I know that I put a lot into it and I know that to make it understandable to every reader I would probably have to expand every section by up to 5 pages. I might do that in the future if people are interested in reading more. It’s not possible in a blog post though. People expect a blog post to be short and succinct.

      Your other point of criticism is expactly the reason why I have written this article. Because I had heard people say before that mandatory paternity testing would cause innocent children distress. Distress is almost always caused by unresolved conflicts. I think it is possible in some cases to have a healthy relationship again after a partner has cheated. But for that both have to work on repairing that relationship. A family where such things are hidden can never be healthy. That is my personal observation and the current psychology research.

  2. Not yet read all the article, just telling of me:

    My children (two sons, today grown-up) were the adventure of my life. No doubt both are my ones.

    But​—​just hopthetically thinking​—​if today, if I learned that one of them had another biological father, I’d talk to him, saying it’s ok if he will seek him, and ask him if it’s ok if he stays my son in every matter that counts.

    I’m sure he would agree. Children are not my property but their own.

    • And I agree with you. It is the relationship that matters, that you have with your sons, not whether or not they carry your genes. After all, both men and women, are perfectly capable of forming strong bonds with children that they are not biologically related to. Contrary to current widespread belief a fathers bon with his children is as strong as that of a mother, even though he hasn’t carried the baby in his womb for 9 months.

      No, I don’t see the increeasing call from men for mandatory paternity testing at birth as a drive to pass on their genetic material. You say: “Children are not my property but their own.” but maybe it is an attempt at ownership because in the current situation your statement is untrue. Children are at the moment a mother’s property. They can be ripped from a man’s life at any moment in time. Nobody can live like that. You are absolutely right, we don’t own another person. But everyone needs some assurance that the people they care about are there to stay.

  3. As much as it would be devastating for a woman to learn she has raised a child that is not hers biologically, the same is true for men. There is no need to see deeper into this. Fairness and equality is 50/50, nothing but.

  4. Another sound reason is that as we understand more about genetic factors in the development of diseases it becomes increasingly important for people to know their true genetic background

  5. I’ve advised all the people in my family to have a paternity test, married or not. There is no harm in establishing paternity, it doesn’t degrade the mother and it clears any potential issues in the future if the relationship that created a child collapses. Paternity testing should be included in the standard newborn screenings. I would also hope with the paternity testing it would automatically extend custodial rights to fathers that aren’t typically granted. In Tennessee, my brother had no custodial rights to either of his children once the relationship ended. He had a “right” to pay child support but “go get a lawyer” was what the judge said to see his children.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s